4.7 Article

Prostaglandin I2 Promotes Recruitment of Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Limits Vascular Remodeling

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.193730

关键词

vascular remodeling; prostaglandin I-2; endothelial progenitor cells; fibronectin; adhesion

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan
  2. Takeda Science Foundation
  3. Akiyama Memorial Foundation
  4. Suhara Memorial Foundation
  5. Smoking Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) play an important role in the self-healing of a vascular injury by participating in the reendothelialization that limits vascular remodeling. We evaluated whether prostaglandin I-2 plays a role in the regulation of the function of EPCs to limit vascular remodeling. Methods and Results-EPCs (Lin(-)cKit(+)Flk-1(+) cells) were isolated from the bone marrow (BM) of wild-type (WT) mice or mice lacking the prostaglandin I-2 receptor IP (IP-/- mice). Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis showed that EPCs among BM cells specifically express IP. The cellular properties of EPCs, adhesion, migration, and proliferation on fibronectin were significantly attenuated in IP-deficient EPCs compared with WT EPCs. In contrast, IP agonists facilitated these functions in WT EPCs, but not in IP-deficient EPCs. The specific deletion of IP in BM cells, which was performed by transplanting BM cells of IP-/- mice to WT mice, accelerated wire injury-mediated neointimal hyperplasia in the femoral artery. Notably, transfused WT EPCs, but not IP-deficient EPCs, were recruited to the injured vessels, participated in reendothelialization, and efficiently rescued the accelerated vascular remodeling. Conclusion-These findings clearly indicate that the prostaglandin I-2-IP system is essential for EPCs to accomplish their function and plays a critical role in the regulation of vascular remodeling. (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30:464-470.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据