4.7 Article

Tea and Coffee Consumption and Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.201939

关键词

coronary heart disease; stroke; mortality; coffee; tea

资金

  1. European Commission
  2. Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports
  3. Dutch Cancer Society
  4. ZonMW the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
  5. World Cancer Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-To examine the associations of coffee and tea consumption with risk of morbidity and mortality of stroke and coronary heart disease (CHD) and with all-cause mortality. Methods and Results-Coffee and tea consumption were assessed with a validated food-frequency questionnaire, and 37 514 participants were observed for 13 years for the occurrence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. A U-shaped association between coffee and CHD was found, with the lowest hazard ratio (HR [95% CI]) for 2.1 to 3.0 cups per day (0.79 [0.65 to 0.96]; P-trend=0.01). Tea was inversely associated with CHD, with the lowest HR (95% CI) for more than 6.0 cups per day (0.64 [0.46 to 0.90]; P-trend=0.02). No associations between tea or coffee and stroke were found (P-trend=0.63 and P-trend=0.32, respectively). Although not significant, coffee slightly reduced the risk for CHD mortality (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.11; P-trend=0.12) for 3.1 to 6.0 cups per day. A U-shaped association between tea and CHD mortality was observed, with an HR of 0.55 (95% CI, 0.31 to 0.97; P-trend=0.03) for 3.1 to 6.0 cups per day. Neither coffee nor tea was associated with stroke (P-trend=0.22 and P-trend=0.74, respectively) and all-cause mortality (P-trend=0.33 and P-trend=0.43, respectively). Conclusion-High tea consumption is associated with a reduced risk of CHD mortality. Our results suggest a slight risk reduction for CHD mortality with moderate coffee consumption and strengthen the evidence on the lower risk of CHD with coffee and tea consumption. (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30:1665-1671.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据