4.7 Article

Rapid Procoagulant Phosphatidylserine Exposure Relies on High Cytosolic Calcium Rather Than on Mitochondrial Depolarization

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.190926

关键词

platelets; Jurkat; apoptosis; procoagulant phosphatidylserine; thrombin plus convulxin

资金

  1. Nouvelle Societe Francaise d'Atherosclerose
  2. Societe Francaise d'Hematologie
  3. Fondation de France [2005 005347]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-Relationships between intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+](cyt)) and apoptotic events, such as mitochondrial depolarization (Delta Psi m loss) and Bcl-2 and Bad phosphorylation, were analyzed in platelets and Jurkat cells in relation to rapid procoagulant phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure. Methods and Results-Platelets were stimulated with A23187, thapsigargin (TG) and thrombin plus convulxin (Thr/Cvx), and Jurkat cells with ionomycin, in the presence or absence of cyclosporin A (CsA), a mitochondrial permeability transition pore inhibitor. Delta Psi m loss occurred when platelets were stimulated in Ca2+ medium in conditions exposing PS, but also in EGTA medium. CsA inhibited PS exposure, [Ca2+](cyt) increase, and Delta Psi m loss in platelets stimulated with TG and Thr/Cvx, but had no inhibitory effect on A23187 stimulation. CsA reduced TG-induced Ca2+ release from the endoplasmic reticulum and, consequently, external Ca2+ influx. In ionomycin-stimulated Jurkat cells, rapid PS exposure was evidenced but not Delta Psi m loss, and CsA did not inhibit the process. The status of phosphorylated Bad and Bcl-2 in both cell types remained unchanged on stimulation. Conclusions-Whether Delta Psi m loss occurs or not, PS exposure is triggered by a high [Ca2+](cyt) increase. Data further demonstrate that CsA prevents membrane scrambling by inhibiting the high [Ca2+](cyt) increase, independently of its effect on mitochondrial permeability transition pore. (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009; 29: 1883-1889.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据