4.7 Article

A Common Variant in Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein 6 Gene (LRP6) Is Associated With LDL-Cholesterol

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.185355

关键词

gene; genetics; LDL-cholesterol; lipids; association

资金

  1. NIH Fogarty International Research Collaboration Award [R03 TW007165]
  2. British Heart Foundation [PG/06/097]
  3. FOGARTY INTERNATIONAL CENTER [R03TW007165] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-A rare mutation in low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 gene (LRP6) was identified as the primary molecular defect underlying monogenic form of coronary artery disease. We hypothesized that common variants in LRP6 could predispose subjects to elevated LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C). Methods and Results-Twelve common ( minor allele frequency >= 0.1) single nucleotide polymorphisms in LRP6 were genotyped in 703 individuals from 213 Polish pedigrees (Silesian Cardiovascular Study families). The family-based analysis revealed that the minor allele of rs10845493 clustered with elevated LDL-C in offspring more frequently than expected by chance (P=0.0053). The quantitative analysis restricted to subjects free of lipid-lowering treatment confirmed the association between rs10845493 and age-, sex-, and BMI-adjusted circulating levels of LDL-C in families as well as 2 additional populations - 218 unrelated subjects from Silesian Cardiovascular Study replication panel and 1138 individuals from Young Men Cardiovascular Association cohort (P=0.0268, P=0.0476, and P=0.0472, respectively). In the inverse variance weighted meta-analysis of the 3 populations each extra minor allele copy of rs10845493 was associated with 0.14 mmol/L increase in age-, sex-, and BMI-adjusted LDL-C (SE=0.05, P=0.0038). Conclusions-Common polymorphism in the gene underlying monogenic form of coronary artery disease impacts on risk of LDL-C elevation. (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:1316-1321.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据