4.7 Article

Diurnal and ultradian dynamics of serum adiponectin in healthy men: Comparison with leptin, circulating soluble leptin receptor, and cortisol patterns

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 88, 期 6, 页码 2838-2843

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2002-021721

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P41-RR13622, M01-RR01032] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [K30 HL04095] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIA NIH HHS [P60-AG08812] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK58785] Funding Source: Medline
  5. ODCDC CDC HHS [H75-CCH119124] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adiponectin is an abundant serum adipokine secreted exclusively from differentiated adipocytes, which plays an important role in regulating insulin sensitivity. The dynamics of circulating adiponectin concentrations have yet to be systematically investigated. We sought to determine whether serum adiponectin levels exhibit diurnal or ultradian rhythms in healthy normal- weight men and to compare the 24- h profile of adiponectin fluctuations with those of leptin, leptin- binding protein ( sOB- R), and cortisol. We collected blood samples at 15- min intervals over 24 h from six subjects receiving an isocaloric diet, and we measured adiponectin, leptin, sOB- R, and cortisol levels. Fourier and cross- correlation analyses were performed on these time series to study diurnal variations, and the Cluster7 program was used for pulsatility analysis. Circulating adiponectin and sOB- R levels exhibited ultradian pulsatility as well as a diurnal variation with a significant decline at night, reaching a nadir in the early morning. The 24- h variations of serum adiponectin and sOB- R were nearly identical and followed those of cortisol after a few hours, but were out- of- phase with leptin diurnal rhythms. These data suggest that adiponectin and sOB- R levels might be influenced by common regulatory factors and challenge the notion that cortisol may have a direct inhibitory effect on adiponectin in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据