4.7 Article

Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques Stabilize After Stroke Insights Into the Natural Process of Atherosclerotic Plaque Stabilization

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.173658

关键词

atherosclerosis; carotid arteries; inflammation; plaque; stroke

资金

  1. European Union [OIF21773]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-Rupture of unstable atherosclerotic plaques is the pathological substrate for acute ischemic events. Underlying cellular and molecular characteristics of plaque rupture have been studied extensively. However, the natural course of symptomatic plaque remodeling after ischemic events is relatively unexplored. Methods and Results-Atherosclerotic carotid plaques were obtained from 804 symptomatic (stroke = 204 and TIA = 426) and asymptomatic (n = 174) patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. The presence of macrophages, smooth muscle cells (SMC), collagen, calcification, and lipid-core size were assessed histologically. At protein level, inflammatory mediators (interleukin [IL]-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, interferon-gamma [INF-gamma], tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-alpha], matrix degrading proteinases (MMPs), and an apoptosis marker (caspase-3) were determined. We associated plaque characteristics with time elapsed between the latest event and surgery. Early after stroke and TIA, plaques revealed an unstable phenotype. After stroke, the content of macrophages decreased significantly with time (P = 0.02), whereas SMC content tended to increase. At protein level, IL-6, IL-8 expression levels and caspase activity strongly decreased after stroke or TIA. Conclusions-Symptomatic carotid lesions remodel into more stable plaques over time after stroke. Changes in IL-6 and IL-8 and caspase preceded the decrease of macrophages. These temporal phenotypic plaque alterations should be taken into account for biomarker and therapeutic target validation studies using human atherosclerotic plaques. (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009; 29: 128-133.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据