4.7 Article

Soluble N-Cadherin Overexpression Reduces Features of Atherosclerotic Plaque Instability

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.178087

关键词

apoptosis; atherosclerosis; cell adhesion molecules; smooth muscle; macrophages

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation [FS/03/080/15921, PG/07/081/23619]
  2. British Heart Foundation [FS/07/053/24069] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives-Vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) apoptosis contributes to atherosclerotic plaque instability and myocardial infarction. Consequently, reducing VSMC apoptosis may be beneficial for reducing plaque instability and acute coronary events. We previously demonstrated that N-cadherin, a cell-cell adhesion molecule, reduces VSMC apoptosis in vitro. In this study, we examined whether a soluble form of N-cadherin (SNC) affected VSMC apoptosis and plaque stability. Methods and Results-SNC significantly inhibited VSMC apoptosis in vitro by approximate to 50% via activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor, phosphoinositide-3 kinase, and Akt signaling. SNC also significantly reduced macrophage and foam cell-macrophage apoptosis in vitro by >50%, without affecting monocyte invasion or macrophage proliferation. Elevation of plasma levels of SNC in male apolipoprotein E-deficient mice with existing atherosclerosis via adenoviral delivery significantly reduced VSMC and macrophage apoptosis in brachiocephalic artery plaques by approximate to 60%. Additionally, SNC promoted plaques of a more stable phenotype by elevating VSMC: macrophage ratio and presence of VSMC-rich fibrous cap, as well as attenuating macrophage number and incidence of buried fibrous caps (a surrogate plaque rupture marker). Conclusions-In summary, this study demonstrates that SNC suppressed plaque instability by attenuation of apoptosis, suggesting that SNC may have a therapeutic potential for retarding plaque instability. (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009; 29: 195-201.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据