4.7 Article

Overexpression of Adiponectin Receptors Potentiates the Antiinflammatory Action of Subeffective Dose of Globular Adiponectin in Vascular Endothelial Cells

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.178061

关键词

adiponectin; endothelium; adhesion molecule; gene expression; diabetes

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30470810, 30890041, 30821001]
  2. Major National Basic Research Program of China [2006CB503906]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-A decreased plasma level of adiponectin is associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome and correlated with endothelial dysfunction. This study aimed to investigate the regulated expression of the newly identified adiponectin receptors (AdipoR1 and 2) and their roles in the endothelial expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha. Methods and Results-Immunohistochemical study and quantitative RT-PCR demonstrated that globular adiponectin suppressed the TNF-alpha-induced ICAM-1 expression in a dose-dependent manner in mouse aorta and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Adenovirus-mediated overexpression of AdipoR1 and 2 in ECs significantly enhanced the suppressive effect of a subeffective dose of adiponectin on TNF-alpha-induced ICAM-1 expression and NF-kappa B activation. Promoter reporter assays and small interfering RNA revealed that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha may function as an important pathway downstream of adiponectin and its receptors. Furthermore, overexpression of AdipoRs in rat carotid arteries markedly decreased the induction of ICAM-1 in vivo. Conclusions-We provide novel evidence that upregulation of AdipoRs in ECs potentiates the antiinflammatory effect of adiponectin; modulating adiponectin receptors may have potential therapeutic applications for cardiovascular complications associated with metabolic syndrome and diabetes. (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009; 29: 67-74.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据