4.7 Article

In vivo arterial lipoprotein lipase expression augments inflammatory responses and impairs vascular dilatation

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.153239

关键词

triglyceride; fatty acids; lipolysis; adhesion molecules; endothelial cells

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL45095] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [NHLBI 73029] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective - Although epidemiologic data suggest that hypertriglyceridemia and elevated plasma levels of fatty acids are toxic to arteries, in vitro correlates have been inconsistent. To investigate whether increased endothelial cell expression of lipoprotein lipase ( LpL), the primary enzyme creating free fatty acids from circulating triglycerides (TG), affects vascular function, we created transgenic mice that express human LpL (hLpL) driven by the promoter and enhancer of the Tie2 receptor. Methods and Results - Mice expressing this transgene, denoted EC-hLpL and L for low and H for high expression, had decreased plasma TG levels compared with wild-type mice (WT): 106 +/- 31 in WT, 37 +/- 17 ( line H), and 63 +/- 31 mg/ dL ( line L) because of a reduction in VLDL TG; plasma cholesterol and HDL levels were unaltered. Crossing a high expressing EC-hLpL transgene onto the LpL knockout background allowed for survival of the pups; TG in these mice was approximately equal to that of heterozygous LpL knockout mice. Surprisingly, under control conditions the EC-hLpL transgene did not alter arterial function or endothelial cell gene expression; however, after tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha treatment, arterial vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), E-selectin, and endogenous TNF-alpha mRNA levels were increased and arteries had impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. This was associated with reduced eNOS dimers. Conclusions - Therefore, we hypothesize that excess vascular wall LpL augments vascular dysfunction in the setting of inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据