4.5 Article

Co-expression of adrenomedullin and adrenomedullin receptors in rat epididymis: Distinct physiological actions on anion transport

期刊

BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION
卷 68, 期 6, 页码 2005-2012

出版社

SOC STUDY REPRODUCTION
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.011015

关键词

epididymis; neuropeptides; polypeptide receptors; sperm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adrenomedullin (AM) has been found in the brain as well as in various peripheral tissues, including reproductive organs such as the testis and the prostate. Here, we report the expression of AM in the rat epididymis and its role in anion secretion. Whole-epididymal extracts had 35.3 +/- 1.4 fmol of immunoreactive AM per mg of protein, and immunocytochemical studies showed positive AM immunostaining in the epithelial cells. By solution-hybridization-RNase protection assay, preproAM, mRNA was detected at high levels in the epididymis. Gel filtration chromatography of AM showed two peaks, with the predominant one eluting at the position of authentic rat AM (1-50). Specific binding of AM to the epididymis, which could be displaced by calcitonin gene-related peptide, was observed. The epididymis also bound to calcitonin gene-related peptide, and this was displaceable by AM. Furthermore, the epididymis was shown to co-express mRNA encoding the calcitonin receptor-like receptor and receptor activity-modifying proteins, RAMP1/RAMP2. The corpus region had the highest AM level and gene expression and the lowest active peptide:precursor ratio. However, mRNA levels of the receptor and the receptor activity-modifying proteins were similar in all regions. In monolayer cultures derived from the rat epididymal cells, AM stimulated short-circuit current on the luminal side in a dose-dependent manner. Our results demonstrate the presence of AM, preproAM mRNA, AM receptors, and specific-binding sites in the rat epididymis as well as the possible role of AM in the regulation of electrolyte and fluid secretion in the epididymis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据