4.7 Article

Draco: A failure of the tidal model

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 589, 期 2, 页码 798-809

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/374816

关键词

galaxies : dwarf; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : kinematics and dynamics galaxies : structure; Local Group; stellar dynamics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We test whether the structural properties of the nearby dwarf spheroidal (dSph) galaxy Draco, a well-studied Milky Way companion, can be reconciled with the suggestion that dSphs are unbound tidal remnants with a large depth extent along the line of sight. In order to apply the observational test of this hypothesis, suggested by Klessen & Zhao, we use public photometric data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) to explore the width of Draco's blue horizontal branch over a range of areas covering 0.06-6.25 deg(2) centered on Draco. The SDSS database is the only currently existing database with sufficient depth and area coverage to permit a stringent test of the tidal models. Blue horizontal branch stars were chosen as tracers of Draco's spatial extent and depth because of their low contamination by Galactic foreground stars and since they have a spatially more extended distribution than the more centrally concentrated red horizontal branch stars. Indeed, we show that blue horizontal branch stars extend beyond the previously inferred limiting radii of Draco, consistent with the observed absence of a truncated stellar surface density pro. le of this dSph (Odenkirchen et al.). Following the method of Klessen & Kroupa, we calculate new models for a galaxy without dark matter, using Draco's morphological properties as constraints. The resulting models are unable to reproduce the narrow observed horizontal branch width of Draco, which stays roughly constant regardless of the field of view. We conclude that Draco cannot be the remnant of a tidally disrupted satellite but is probably strongly dark matter-dominated, as suggested independently by the structural analysis conducted by Odenkirchen et al. and by the kinematic analysis of Kleyna et al.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据