4.6 Article

Dynamics of microbial communities on marine snow aggregates: Colonization, growth, detachment, and grazing mortality of attached bacteria

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 69, 期 6, 页码 3036-3047

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.6.3036-3047.2003

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We studied the dynamics of microbial communities attached to model aggregates (4-mm-diameter agar spheres) and the component processes of colonization, detachment, growth, and grazing mortality. Agar spheres incubated in raw seawater were rapidly colonized by bacteria, followed by flagellates and ciliates. Colonization can be described as a diffusion process, and encounter volume rates were estimated at about 0.01 and 0.1 cm(3) h(-1) for bacteria and flagellates, respectively. After initial colonization, the abundances of flagellates and ciliates remained approximately constant at 10(3) to 10(4) and similar to10(2) cells sphere(-1), respectively, whereas bacterial populations increased at a declining rate to >10(7) cells sphere(-1). Attached microorganisms initially detached at high specific rates of similar to10(-2) min(-1), but the bacteria gradually became irreversibly attached to the spheres. Bacterial growth (0 to 2 day(-1)) was density dependent and declined hyperbolically when cell density exceeded a threshold. Bacterivorous flagellates grazed on the sphere surface at an average saturated rate of 15 bacteria flagellate(-1) h(-1). At low bacterial densities, the flagellate surface clearance rate was similar to5 x 10(-7) cm(2) min(-1), but it declined hyperbolically with increasing bacterial density. Using the experimentally estimated process rates and integrating the component processes in a simple model reproduces the main features of the observed microbial population dynamics. Differences between observed and predicted population dynamics suggest, however, that other factors, e.g., antagonistic interactions between bacteria, are of importance in shaping marine snow microbial communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据