4.7 Article

Changing desiccation tolerance of pea embryo protoplasts during germination

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 54, 期 387, 页码 1607-1614

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erg170

关键词

desiccation tolerance; embryo; germination; pea; Pisum sativum L.; protoplast isolation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protoplasts were isolated from pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) embryonic axes during and after germination to determine whether the loss of desiccation tolerance in the embryos also occurs in the protoplasts. At all times studied, protoplast survival decreased as water content decreased; however, the sensitivity to dehydration was less when the protoplasts were isolated from embryos that were still desiccation-tolerant (12 h and 18 h of imbibition) than when protoplasts were derived from axes that were sensitive (24 h and 36 h of imbibition). The water content at which 50% of the population was killed (WC50) increased throughout germination and early seedling growth for both the intact tissue and the protoplasts derived from them. Prior to radicle emergence, protoplasts were less desiccation-tolerant than the intact axes; however, protoplasts isolated from radicles shortly after emergence had lower WC(50)s than the intact radicles. A comparison of protoplast survival after isolation and dehydration in either 500 mM sucrose/raffinose or 700 mM sucrose revealed no difference in tolerance except at 24 h of imbibition, when protoplasts treated in the more concentrated solution had improved tolerance of dehydration. Although intact epicotyls are generally more desiccation-tolerant than radicles, protoplasts isolated separately from epicotyls and radicles did not differ in tolerance. Collectively, these data suggest that protoplasts gradually lose desiccation tolerance during germination, as do the orthodox embryos from which they were derived. However, even prior to radicle emergence, protoplasts display a sensitivity to progressive dehydration that is similar to that shown by recalcitrant and ageing embryos.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据