4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

A study on electrolyte interactions with graphite anodes exhibiting structures with various amounts of rhombohedral phase

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 528-537

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00278-7

关键词

graphite anode; lithium-ion battery; solid electrolyte interphase (SEI); electrolyte additive; rhombohedral phase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lithium-ion battery anode performance of graphites with and without high amounts of rhombohedral phase in the structure has been investigated. A main outcome was that in addition to possible graphite bulk structure effects, there are also strong influences of the graphite surface and the graphite sub-surface (part of the graphite bulk at the border of the particle near the surface) on the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation process and on the tendency to solvent co-intercalation into graphite. Using transmission electron microscopy with atomic resolution, we indeed could determine unique and also different surface and sub-surface morphologies for the two graphites. In case of the graphite without rhombohedral phase, unique convoluted graphene layers could be determined at the prismatic surfaces; in case of the graphite with a high rhombohedral phase content a strongly disordered, approximately 1 nm thick sub-surface layer could be determined. The anode performance depends primarily on these surface and sub-surface graphite properties and the used electrolytes. The differences in the sub-surface layer structure have a most significant influence on the performance in an ethylene carbonate/dimethyl carbonate electrolyte. The differences in surface structure and morphology are considered to have the highest impact in a propylene carbonate/ethylene sulfite-based electrolyte. For ethylene carbonate/diethyl carbonate electrolyte, the performance differences are small so that no strong dependence on surface or sub-surface structures could be observed. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据