4.5 Article

Developmental and hormonal signals dramatically alter the localization and abundance of insulin receptor substrate proteins in the mammary gland

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 144, 期 6, 页码 2683-2694

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2002-221103

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA-94118] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-52197] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insulin receptor substrates (IRS) are central integrators of hormone, cytokine, and growth factor signaling. IRS proteins can be phosphorylated by a number of signaling pathways critical to normal mammary gland development. Studies in transgenic mice that overexpress IGF-I in the mammary gland suggested that IRS expression is important in the regulation of normal postlactational mammary involution. The goal of these studies was to examine IRS expression in the mouse mammary gland and determine the importance of IRS-1 to mammary development in the virgin mouse. IRS-1 and -2 show distinct patterns of protein expression in the virgin mouse mammary gland, and protein abundance is dramatically increased during pregnancy and lactation, but rapidly lost during involution. Consistent with hormone regulation, IRS-1 protein levels are reduced by ovariectomy, induced by combined treatment with estrogen and progesterone, and vary considerably throughout the estrous cycle. These changes occur without similar changes in mRNA levels, suggesting post-transcriptional control. Mammary glands from IRS-1 null mice have smaller fat pads than wild-type controls, but this reduction is proportional to the overall reduction in body size. Development of the mammary duct (terminal endbuds and branch points) is not altered by the loss of IRS-1, and pregnancy-induced proliferation is not changed. These data indicate that IRS undergo complex developmental and hormonal regulation in the mammary gland, and that IRS-1 is more likely to regulate mammary function in lactating mice than in virgin or pregnant mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据