4.5 Article

Subtype switching of vesicular glutamate transporters at parallel fibre-Purkinje cell synapses in developing mouse cerebellum

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 17, 期 12, 页码 2563-2572

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02698.x

关键词

cerebellum; climbing fibre; immunohistochemistry; in situ hybridization; VGluT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two subtypes of the vesicular glutamate transporter are expressed differentially in two excitatory afferents synapsing on to Purkinje cells: VGluT1 (BNPI) in axon terminals of cerebellar granule cells (i.e. parallel fibres; PFs) and VGluT2 (DNPI) in those of the inferior olivary neurons (climbing fibres; CFs). In the present study, we examined their expression in the developing mouse cerebellum. By in situ hybridization, the inferior olivary nucleus selectively expressed VGluT2 mRNA through postnatal life. In the cerebellum, both subtypes were transcribed in the external and internal granular layers during the first postnatal week. Thereafter, VGluT1 mRNA showed marked upregulation in the internal granular layer, whereas VGluT2 mRNA disappeared from the external and internal granular layers by the end of the third postnatal week. By immunohistochemistry, CF terminals consistently exhibited VGluT2 immunoreactivity in the postnatal cerebellum. By contrast, in the first 10 days of postnatal life, VGluT2 predominated in PF terminals, despite the transcription of both transporters in developing granule cells. During the second 10 days, VGluT2 in PF terminals was replaced with VGluT1 from deep regions of the molecular layer upwards, correlating with dendritic translocation of CFs. This replacement was accomplished by postnatal day 30. Taking that late-borne PFs are laid down successively on earlier ones in the molecular layer, the deep-to-superficial replacement represents maturation-linked switching from VGluT2 to VGluT1 in individual PFs, and is likely to be regulated at both the transcription and translation levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据