4.7 Article

Improved resistive switching phenomena and mechanism using Cu-Al alloy in a new Cu: AlOx/TaOx/TiN structure

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 637, 期 -, 页码 517-523

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.02.168

关键词

Resistive switching; Cu-Al; TaOx; CBRAM; Memory

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) Taiwan [NSC-102-2221-E-182-057MY2]
  2. EOL/ITRI, Hsinchu, Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Improved resistive switching phenomena such as device-to-device uniformity, lower formation voltage (2.8 V) and RESET current, >500 program/erase cycles, longer read endurance of >10(6) cycles with a program/erase pulse width of 1 mu s, and data retention of >225 h under a low current compliance of 300 mu A have been discussed by using Cu-Al alloy in Cu: AlOx/TaOx/TiN conductive bridging resistive random access memory (CBRAM) device for the first time. The switching mechanism is based on a thinner with dense Cu filament formation/dissolution through the defects in the Cu: AlOx/TaOx/TiN structure owing to enhance memory characteristics. These characteristics have been confirmed by measuring randomly picked 100 devices having via-hole size of 0.4 x 0.4 mu m(2). The Cu-Al alloy becomes Cu: AlOx buffer layer and Ta2O5 becomes TaOx switching layer owing to Gibbs free energy dependency. All layers and elements are observed by high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) image and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). By developing a numerical equation in between RESET current and formation voltage, it is found that a higher rate of Cu migration is observed owing to both the defective switching layer and larger size, which results a lower formation voltage and RESET current of the Cu:AlOx/TaOx/TiN structure, as compared to Cu/Ta2O5/TiN under external positive bias on the Cu electrode. This simple Cu:AlOx/TaOx/TiN CBRAM device is useful for future nanoscale non-volatile memory application. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据