4.7 Article

Synthesis, characterization of magnetic-sepiolite supported with TiO2, and the photocatalytic performance over Cr(VI) and 2,4-dichlorophenol co-existed wastewater

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 638, 期 -, 页码 435-442

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.03.070

关键词

Photocatalysis; Magnetic sepiolite; Titanium dioxide; Simultaneous removal

资金

  1. Science and Technology Project of Hunan Provincial Science & Technology Department [2013FJ3071]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2010ZX07212-008]
  3. Project of Hunan Province University Innovation Platform [11K070]
  4. Postgraduate Innovation Fund Project of the Education Department of Hunan Province [CX2011B266]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a novel photocatalyst of magnetic-modified sepiolite supported with nanosized titanium dioxide (TiO2/MMS) with efficient photoactivity and magnetic separability has been successfully prepared by a sol-gel method. The prepared samples were characterized by SEM, XRD, UV-vis, XPS, VSM and BET surface area analysis. The titania particles supported on the magnetic sepiolite was mainly anatase phase, and the composite showed super-magnetic properties which could be easily separated by an external magnetic field. Compared with neat TiO2, the TiO2/MMS composite exhibited enhanced adsorption ability and higher photocatalytic activity, 90.9% of the total DCP was removed after 120 min of UV irradiation. Moreover, in the binary system, the simultaneous photocatalytic treatment of Cr(VI) and DCP significantly enhanced the reduction, the removal efficiency of Cr(VI) and DCP was about 100% and 96.9%, respectively. The results revealed the feasibility and the effectiveness of using magnetic sepiolite supported TiO2 as photocatalyst for simultaneous decontamination of Cr(VI) and DCP, which may be due to the synergistic effect between the photocatalytic redox reactions. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据