Characterization of drug-specific T cells in lamotrigine hypersensitivity

Background: Lamotrigine is associated with hypersensitivity reactions, which are most commonly characterized by skin rash. An immune etiology has been postulated, though the nature of this is unclear. Objectives: The aim of this study was to characterize the role of T cells in lamotrigine hypersensitivity. Methods: A lymphocyte transformation test was performed on 4 hypersensitive patients. Lymphocytes from 3 of 4 lamotrigine-hypersensitive patients proliferated when stimulated with lamotrigine. T-cell clones were generated from one patient to further characterize the nature of the T-cell involvement. Cells were characterized in terms of their phenotype, functionality, and mechanisms of antigen presentation and cytotoxicity. Results: Of the 44 drug-specific T-cell clones generated, most were CD4(+) with occasional CD8(+) cells. All clones expressed the up T-cell receptor; several Vbeta 5.1(+) or 9(+) T-cell clones were generated. All clones also expressed the skin-homing receptor cutaneous lymphocyte antigen. Lamotrigine-stimulated T cells were cytotoxic and secreted perforin, IFN-gamma, IL-5, and macrophage inflammatory protein la, macrophage inflammatory protein 1beta, RANTES, and I-309. Lamotrigine was present on HLA-DR and HLA-DQ by antigen-presenting cells in the absence of drug metabolism and processing. The T-cell receptor of certain clones could accommodate analogs of lamotrigine, but no cross-reactivity was seen with other anticonvulsants. Conclusions: Our data provide evidence that T cells are involved in the pathogenesis of some lamotrigine-hypersensitivity reactions. The identification of drug-specific cells that express cutaneous lymphocyte antigen and type 1 cytokines after T-cell receptor activation is consistent with the clinical symptoms. Furthermore, identification of large numbers of Vbeta 5.1(+) T cells suggests that polymorphisms within T-cell receptor genes might act as determinants of susceptibility. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;111:1393-1403.).