4.6 Article

An experimental and numerical study of particle nucleation and growth during low-pressure thermal decomposition of silane

期刊

JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE
卷 34, 期 6, 页码 691-711

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00029-6

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses an experimental and numerical study of the nucleation and growth of particles during low-pressure (similar to1.0 Torr) thermal decomposition of silane (SiH4). A Particle Beam Mass Spectrometer was used to measure particle size distributions in a parallel-plate showerhead-type semiconductor reactor. An aerosol dynamics moment-type formulation coupled with a chemically reacting fluid flow model was used to predict particle concentration, size, and transport in the reactor. Particle nucleation kinetics via a sequence of chemical clustering reactions among silicon hydride molecular clusters, growth by heterogeneous chemical reactions on particle surfaces and coagulation, and transport by convection, diffusion, and thermophoresis were included in the model. The effect of pressure, temperature, flow residence time, carrier gas, and silane concentration were examined under conditions typically used for low-pressure (similar to1 Torr) thermal chemical vapor deposition of polysilicon. The numerical simulations predict that several pathways involving linear and polycyclic silicon hydride molecules result in formation of particle nuclei, which subsequently grow by heterogeneous reactions on the particle surfaces. The model is in good agreement with observations for the pressure and temperature at which particle formation begins, particle sizes and growth rates, and relative particle concentrations at various process conditions. A simplified, computationally inexpensive, quasi-coupled modeling approach is suggested as an engineering tool for process equipment design and contamination control during low-pressure thermal silicon deposition. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据