4.7 Article

Mechanisms of tetraneedlelike ZnO whiskers reinforced forsterite/bioglass scaffolds

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 636, 期 -, 页码 341-347

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.02.077

关键词

Scaffolds; Forsterite/bioglass; ZnO whiskers; Reinforced mechanisms

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51222506, 81372366, 81472058]
  2. High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2015AA033503]
  3. Overseas, Hong Kong & Macao Scholars Collaborated Researching Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China [81428018]
  4. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [14JJ1006]
  5. Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation, China [131050]
  6. Shenzhen Strategic Emerging Industrial Development Funds [JCYJ20130401160614372]
  7. Open-End Fund for the Valuable and Precision Instruments of Central South University
  8. Central South University [2013JSJJ011, 2013JSJJ046]
  9. State Key Laboratory of New Ceramic and Fine Processing Tsinghua University [KF201413]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tetraneedlelike ZnO whiskers (T-ZnOw) reinforced forsterite/bioglass scaffolds were achieved using selective laser sintering. The effects of T-ZnOw on the mechanical properties and on microstructure of the scaffolds were studied. The optimum compressive strength and fracture toughness were 59.17 +/- 2.07 MPa and 2.61 +/- 0.09 MPa m(1/2) respectively when T-ZnOw was 3 wt.%, which were about 155.26% and 141.08% that of the T-ZnOw free scaffold. The strengthening mechanisms were ascribed to the unique tetraneedlelike structure of T-ZnOw and the corresponding stress transfer. The toughening mechanisms were characterized by crack deflection, crack bridging, crack tip, T-ZnOw pull out and the change of fracture mode. In addition, cell culture test illustrated that T-ZnOw improved the adhesion and spread of MG-63 cells. The study indicated that the reinforced forsterite/bioglass scaffolds have a great potential for load-bearing applications. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据