4.7 Article

The influence of post-mortem ageing and roasting on the microstructure, texture and collagen solubility of bovine semitendinosus muscle

期刊

MEAT SCIENCE
卷 64, 期 2, 页码 191-198

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00179-1

关键词

bovine ST; roasting; microstructure; texture; collagen solubility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bovine semitendinosus (ST) muscles aged for 5 and 12 days at 4 degreesC were roasted at 170 degreesC to internal temperatures of 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90 degreesC. Microstructural changes in meat were evaluated using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Texture profile analysis (TPA) and measurements of the shear force values of samples were conducted using a texture analyser. The cooking losses and quantity of total and soluble collagen were also estimated. The structure of intramuscular connective tissue and myofibrillar structure of meat after 5 days of ageing was very regular. In 12-day-aged samples fibrous and myofibrillar structures were less distinct, damages of endomysium tubes appeared and fibres of perimysium were swelled. Ageing of ST muscle for 12 days caused a two-fold increase in the quantity of soluble collagen and a two-fold decrease in the value of TPA parameters-hardness and chewiness, as compared to 5-day-aged samples. The decrease in fibre diameter and sarcomere length during roasting started at 60 degreesC in 5-day-aged meat and at 50 degreesC in 12-day-aged samples. The shear force values measured after roasting were lower for 12-day-aged meat than for 5-day-aged samples. The quantity of soluble collagen in roasted meat increased at an internal temperature of 80 degreesC. At a higher temperature of meat this variable depended on the degree of meat ageing. The cooking losses during roasting of meat were about 3% lower for 12-day-aged than for 5-day-aged samples. In the examined range of internal temperature of meat the cooking losses and the sarcomere length were negatively correlated. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据