4.7 Article

Impairment of context-adapted movement selection in a primate model of presymptomatic Parkinson's disease

期刊

BRAIN
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 1392-1408

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awg139

关键词

Parkinson's disease; monkey; basal ganglia; movement selection; procedural learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The MPTP model allows the presymptomatic stage of parkinsonism to be studied in primates and hence specific behavioural manifestations of moderate nigrostriatal denervation to be identified. On the basis of the physiological literature, we hypothesized that depletion of striatal dopamine could impair the selection of context-relevant habits. To examine this hypothesis, we trained three African green monkeys to perform a simple reach-and-grasp task, including three contexts differing only in terms of the presence and position of transparent obstacles. At the end of training, the analysis of reaching trajectories showed that intact monkeys had built a repertoire of movements, from which they could select the appropriate one depending on the context. In the course of MPTP intoxication (0.3-0.4 mg/kg every 4-5 days) and before parkinsonian motor symptoms appeared, the reaction time (RT), movement time (MT) and variability of reaching trajectories increased in all monkeys. Frequently, the initial direction was not adapted to the context, and consequently the movement was either corrected online or restarted under visual assistance. These non-adapted trajectories appeared to be the main reason for the increase in both RT (because of difficulty in selecting) and MT (because of the need to make corrections). These observations indicate that moderate MPTP-induced dopamine depletion results in a deficit in the selection of context-adapted movement, which is compensated by corrections using either proprioceptive or visual feedback. Similar behavioural disorders might therefore occur in the presymptomatic stage of human Parkinson's disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据