4.5 Article

Nematicidal activity of essential oils and organic amendments from Asteraceae against root-knot nematodes

期刊

PLANT PATHOLOGY
卷 52, 期 3, 页码 395-401

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2003.00859.x

关键词

Calendula maritima; Calendula officinalis; Calendula suffruticosa; Chrysanthemum coronarium; Chrysanthemum segetum; Meloidogyne artiellia; nematicide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The essential oil of Chrysanthemum coronarium flowerheads showed strong nematicidal activity in vitro and in growth-chamber experiments. Essential oil concentrations of 2, 4, 8 and 16 mu L mL(-1) , significantly reduced hatch, J (2) survival (determined by final value and area under curves of cumulative percentage hatch or mortality) and reproduction rate of Meloidogyne artiellia in vitro , with the lowest values occurring at 16 mu L mL(-1) . In pot trials with chickpea cv. PV 61, essential oil concentrations of 10-40 mu L per 500 cm(3) soil, applied on sterile cotton pellets, also significantly reduced the nematode's reproduction rate. The biological processes of mortality and hatching/reproduction were adequately described by the monomolecular and expanded negative exponential models, respectively. Effectiveness of soil amendment with either flowers, leaves, roots or seeds of C. coronarium , and flowers from several species of Asteraceae (Chrysanthemum segetum , Calendula maritima , Calendula officinalis and Calendula suffruticosa ) at 5 g per 500 cm(3) soil was tested for suppression of M. artiellia and growth of chickpea cv. PV 61 under growth-chamber conditions. In these tests, flowers of all five Asteraceae species and various parts of C. coronarium significantly reduced reproduction rates of M. artiellia , by 83.0-95.9%, with the minimum rates occurring in infected chickpea plants amended with flowers of C. officinalis and C. suffruticosa . The in vitro and in planta results suggest that the essential oil of C. coronarium and organic amendments from Asteraceae species may serve as nematicides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据