4.5 Article

Measurement of fractional anisotropy using diffusion tensor MRI in supratentorial astrocytic tumors

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
卷 63, 期 2, 页码 109-116

出版社

KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1023977520909

关键词

astrocytic tumor; diffusion tensor MRI; fractional anisotropy; gliomatosis cerebri; histological structure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In vivo, water diffusion displays directionality due to presence of complex microstructural barriers in tissue. The extent of directionality of water diffusion can be expressed as a fractional anisotropy (FA) value, using diffusion tensor MR imaging (DTI). The aim of this study was to determine whether FA values indicate microstructures in astrocytic tumors. We performed DTI in 31 patients with astrocytic tumor, and measured the FA values of tumor and normal brain regions prior to CT-guided stereotactic biopsy. After biopsy, FA values were compared to assess the cellularity and vascularity of tumor tissue. Although mean FA values trended to differ among histological types, all mean tumor FA values were lower than those of normal brain regions. Positive correlation was observed between FA values and both cellularity (r=0.65, p<0.05) and vascularity (r=0.45, p<0.05). We had hypothesized that the FA value of an astrocytic tumor would be determined by a balance between factors increasing the directionality of water diffusion, such as high cellularity and/ or vascularity, and factors decreasing the directionality of water diffusion, such as fiber destruction. However, our results suggest that the FA values of glioblastoma, anaplastic astrocytoma, diffuse astrocytoma and pilocytic astrocytoma are largely affected by cellularity and/ or vascularity, whereas that of gliomatosis cerebri are largely affected by the preservation of nerve fibers. Measurement of FA value using DTI will allow prediction of histological characteristics such as cellularity, vascularity and/ or fiber structure in astrocytic tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据