4.7 Article

Reactive magnetron sputtering of Ni doped ZnO thin film: Investigation of optical, structural, mechanical and magnetic properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 636, 期 -, 页码 85-92

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.02.142

关键词

Thin films; Optical properties; Surface morphology; Magnetic semiconductor

资金

  1. CENTEM project [CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0088]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nickel doped ZnO (ZnO:Ni) thin films are considered to be promising materials for optoelectronic applications. The doping of transition metal ion modifies the optical and physical properties of the materials. Therefore, studies on optical and physical properties are important for such applications. In the present work, the ZnO: Ni thin films with different Ni concentrations were deposited on Si (100) and corning glass substrates at 400 degrees C by reactive magnetron sputtering using Ar and O-2 gas mixture. The (002) growth plane of the ZnO was identified from the X-ray diffraction experiment. It was also confirmed that the films exhibit strong preferred orientation (texture) of crystalline columns in the direction [001] perpendicular to the substrate surface. The optical transmittance, band gap, and refractive indices of the thin films were studied by UV-Vis spectroscopy, photoluminescence and spectroscopic ellipsometry. The optical band gap and refractive index of the thin films decreased with increase of Ni content. The Raman and FT-IR spectroscopic studies were used to explain the modes of vibrations of the functional groups in the material. The surface topography, grain size, distribution, and fine structure of the thin films were analyzed by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The hardness of the films was measured using a nanoindenter coupled with AFM. The growth of ferromagnetism by the effect of Ni content was studied by vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) at room temperature. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据