4.6 Article

Reciprocal modulation of matrix metalloproteinase-13 and type I collagen genes in rat hepatic stellate cells

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 162, 期 6, 页码 1771-1780

出版社

AMER SOC INVESTIGATIVE PATHOLOGY, INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64312-X

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [R01 AA010541, R01 AA009231, R01AA10541, R01AA09231, R01AA12196] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Collagen degradation by matrix metalloproteinases is the limiting step in reversing liver fibrosis. Although collagen production in cirrhotic livers is increased, the expression and/or activity of matrix metalloproteinases could be normal, increased in early fibrosis, or decreased during advanced liver cirrhosis. Hepatic stellate cells are the main producers of collagens and matrix metalloproteinases in the liver. Therefore, we sought to investigate whether they simultaneously produce alpha1(l) collagen and matrix metalloproteinase-13 mRNAs. In this communication we show that expression of matrix metalloproteinase-13 mRNA is reciprocally modulated by tumor necrosis factor-alpha and transforming growth factor-beta1. When hepatic stellate cells are co-cultured with hepatocytes, matrix metalloproteinase-13 mRNA is up-regulated and alpha1(l) collagen is down-regulated. Injuring hepatocytes with galactosamine further increased matrix metalloproteinase-13 mRNA production. Confocal microscopy and differential centrifugation of co-cultured cells revealed that matrix metalloproteinase-13 is localized mainly within hepatic stellate cells. Studies performed with various hepatic stellate cell lines revealed that they are heterogeneous regarding expression of matrix metalloproteinase-13. Those with myofibroblastic phenotypes produce more type I collagen whereas those resembling freshly isolated hepatic stellate cells express matrix metalloproteinase-13. Overall, these findings strongly support the notion that alpha1(l) collagen and matrix metalloproteinase-13 mRNAs are reciprocally modulated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据