4.0 Article

Folate, vitamin B12, homocysteine, and the MTHFR 677C→T polymorphism in anxiety and depression -: The Hordaland Homocysteine Study

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 60, 期 6, 页码 618-626

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.6.618

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: An association between depression and folate status has been demonstrated in clinical studies, whereas data are sparse on the relationship between depression and other components of I-carbon metabolism such as vitamin B-12, homocysteine, and the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677C-->T polymorphism. The relationship between anxiety and these components is less well known. This study examined the associations between folate, total homocysteine, vitamin B-12, and the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677C-->T polymorphism, and anxiety and depression in a large population-based study. Methods: Anxiety and depression, measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, were assessed in 5948 subjects aged 46 to 49 years (mean, 47.4 years) and 70 to 74 years (mean, 71.9 years) from the Hordaland Homocysteine Study cohort. By means of logistic regression models, anxiety and depression scores were examined in relation to the factors listed above. Results: Overall, hyperhomocysteinemia (plasma total homocysteine level greater than or equal to15.0 mumol/L [greater than or equal to2.02 mg/dL]) (odds ratio, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-3.25) and T/T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genotype (odds ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.62), but not low plasma folate or vitamin B-12 levels, were significantly related to depression without comorbid anxiety disorder. Plasma folate level was inversely associated with depression only in the subgroup of middle-aged women. None of the investigated parameters showed a significant relationship to anxiety. Conclusion: Our results provide further evidence of a role of impaired 1-carbon metabolism in depression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据