4.7 Article

Preferred orientations of open microcracks in granite and their relation with anisotropic elasticity

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1365-1609(03)00014-5

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to study how to deal with open microcracks in rock, anisotropic behaviors of Oshima granite were investigated by carrying out wave velocity tests and uniaxial compression tests, together with observations of microcracks under an optical microscope equipped with a universal stage. Anisotropy in the longitudinal wave velocity V-L and secant deformation modulus E-10 at 10% strength is caused by pre-existing open microcracks, not by pre-existing healed microcracks. The structural anisotropy formed by open microcracks, which is quantitatively represented by a second-rank tensor (called crack tensor), is in good agreement with the directional changes of E-10 and V-L. The mechanical, as well as structural, anisotropy shows rhombic symmetry with orthogonal symmetry axes in the directions roughly normal to the rift, grain and hardway planes, which are parallel to the major joint sets in the field. Since longitudinal wave velocity changes drastically depending on the density and orientation of open microcracks in granitic rocks, it is suggested that the crack tensor can be determined from non-destructive wave velocity tests. The elastic modulus tensor theoretically formulated in terms of the second-rank crack tensor can be used, as a first-order approximation at least, to describe the anisotropic elasticity of Oshima granite induced by pre-existing open microcracks. It is of particular importance to point out that the micro-scale structure by open microcracks is geometrically similar to the macro-scale structure by joints and faults (scale independent). This finding strongly suggests that some of the conclusions related to open microcracks are applicable to deal with macro-scale cracks in rock masses. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据