4.8 Article

Infliximab but not etanercept induces apoptosis in lamina propria T-lymphocytes from patients with Crohn's disease

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 124, 期 7, 页码 1774-1785

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00382-2

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: Steroid-refractory Crohn's disease responds to therapy with the chimeric anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antibody infliximab. Etanercept, a recombinant TNF receptor/immunoglobulin G fusion protein, is highly effective in rheumatoid arthritis but not in Crohn's disease. Because both infliximab and etanercept are TNF-alpha-neutralizing drugs, we investigated the differences in TNF-alpha-neutralizing capacity and human lymphocyte binding and apoptosis-inducing capacity of both molecules. Methods: We used a nuclear factor kappaB reporter assay and a cytotoxicity bioassay to study TNF-alpha neutralization by infliximab and etanercept. Lymphocyte binding and apoptosis-inducing capacity was investigated using fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis, annexin V staining, and cleaved caspase-3 immunoblotting using mixed lymphocyte reaction-stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) from healthy volunteers and lamina propria T cells from patients wit Crohn's disease. Results: Both infliximab and etanercept neutralized TNF-alpha effectively. Infliximab bound to activated PBL and lamina propria T cells, whereas binding of etanercept was equal to a nonspecific control antibody. Infliximab but not etanercept induced peripheral and lamina propria lymphocyte apoptosis when compared with a control antibody. Infliximab activated caspase 3 in a time-dependent manner, whereas etanercept did not. Conclusions: Although both infliximab and etanercept showed powerful TNF-alpha neutralization, only infliximab was able to bind to PBL and lamina propria T cells and subsequently to induce apoptosis of activated lymphocytes. These data may provide a biological basis for the difference in efficacy of the 2 TNF-alpha-neutralizing drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据