4.4 Article

Adaptation and temporal decorrelation by single neurons in the primary visual cortex

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 89, 期 6, 页码 3279-3293

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00242.2003

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Limiting redundancy in the real-world sensory inputs is of obvious benefit for efficient neural coding, but little is known about how this may be accomplished by biophysical neural mechanisms. One possible cellular mechanism is through adaptation to relatively constant inputs. Recent investigations in primary visual (V1) cortical neurons have demonstrated that adaptation to prolonged changes in stimulus contrast is mediated in part through intrinsic ionic currents, a Ca2+-activated K+ current (I-KCa) and especially a Na+-activated K+ current (I-KNa). The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that the activation of adaptation ionic currents may provide a cellular mechanism for temporal decorrelation in V1. A conductance-based neuron model was simulated, which included an I-KCa and an I-KNa. We show that the model neuron reproduces the adaptive behavior of V1 neurons in response to high contrast inputs. When the stimulus is stochastic with 1/f(2) or 1/f-type temporal correlations, these autocorrelations are greatly reduced in the output spike train of the model neuron. The I-KCa is effective at reducing positive temporal correlations at approximately 100-ms time scale, while a slower adaptation mediated by I-KNa is effective in reducing temporal correlations over the range of 1-20 s. Intracellular injection of stochastic currents into layer 2/3 and 4 (pyramidal and stellate) neurons in ferret primary visual cortical slices revealed neuronal responses that exhibited temporal decorrelation in similarity with the model. Enhancing the slow afterhyperpolarization resulted in a strengthening of the decorrelation effect. These results demonstrate the intrinsic membrane properties of neocortical neurons provide a mechanism for decorrelation of sensory inputs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据