4.8 Article

Humidity Dependence of Tribochemical Wear of Monocrystalline Silicon

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 7, 期 27, 页码 14785-14792

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b03043

关键词

nanowear; tribochemistry; relative humidity; monocrystalline silicon

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [91323302, 51175441, 51375409]
  2. Southwest Jiaotong University
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1435766]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nanowear tests of monocrystalline silicon against a SiO2 microsphere were performed using an atomic force microscope in air as a function of relative humidity (RH = 0%-90%) and in liquid water at a contact pressure of about 1.20 GPa. The experimental results indicated that RH played an important role in the nanowear of the Si/SiO2 interface. In dry air, a hillock-like wear scar with a height of similar to 0.4 nm was formed on the silicon surface. However, with the increase of RH, the wear depth on the silicon surface first increased to a maximum value of similar to 14 nm at 50% RH and then decreased below the detection limit at RH above 85% or in water. The transmission electron microscopy analysis showed that the serious wear on the silicon surface at low and medium RI-Is occurred without subsurface damage, indicating that the wear was due to tribochemical reactions between the Si substrate and the SiO2 counter surface, rather than mechanical damages. The RH dependence of the tribochemical wear could be explained with a model involving the formation of Si-O-Si chemical bonds (bridges) between two solid surfaces. The suppression of tribochemical wear at high RHs or in liquid water might be attributed to the fact that the thickness of the interfacial water layer is thick enough to prevent the solid surfaces from making chemical bridges. The results may help us understand the nanowear mechanism of silicon that is an important material for dynamic microelectromechanical systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据