4.7 Article

Effects of mixed-action κ/μ opioids on cocaine self-administration and cocaine discrimination by rhesus monkeys

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 28, 期 6, 页码 1125-1139

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300105

关键词

cocaine abuse; kappa opioids; cocaine self-administration; cocaine discrimination

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [K05-DA00101, K05-DA00360, R01-DA02519, U19-DA11007, T32-DA07252] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

kappa-Opioid agonists may functionally antagonize some behavioral effects of cocaine, but the role of mixed kappa/mu receptor activity is unclear. The effects of three mixed kappa/mu agonists (MCL-101, (-)cyclorphan, and Mr2034) and one kappa-selective agonist (enadoline) on cocaine self-administration and cocaine discrimination were compared in rhesus monkeys. Acute treatment with all K agonists dose dependently reduced cocaine-maintained responding and produced a downward shift in the cocaine self-administration dose-effect curve (0.001-0.32 mg/kg/inj, i.v.). During 7 days of chronic treatment, (-)cyclorphan (0.0032-0.032 mg/kg/h) and MCL-101 (0.0032-0.032 mg/kg/h) each dose dependently reduced cocaine self-administration maintained by a dose near the peak of the cocaine self-administration dose-effect curve. MCL-101 (0.032mg/kg/h) produced selective and sustained decreases in cocaine self-administration, whereas (-)cyclorphan (0.032 mg/kg/h) had selective but transient effects. In addition, these mixed kappa/mu agonists produced fewer side effects (some salivation) than the K-selective agonist (sedation, salivation, emesis). However, none of these K agonists substituted for or antagonized cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects in monkeys trained to discriminate cocaine (0.4 mg/kg, i.m.) from saline. Thus, K and mixed kappa/mu-opioid agonists may reduce cocaine self-administration without altering cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects. Mixed KIP agonists appear to offer some advantages over selective K agonists as potential treatments for cocaine abuse.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据