4.7 Article

Duplicate FLORICAULA/LEAFY homologs zfl1 and zfl2 control inflorescence architecture and flower patterning in maize

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 130, 期 11, 页码 2385-2395

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.00457

关键词

maize; inflorescence architecture; FLORICAULA; LEAFY

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM-58816] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The homologous transcription factors FLORICAULA of Antirrhinum and LEAFY of Arabidopsis share conserved roles in flower meristem identity and floral patterning. While roles for FLORICAULA/LEAFY homologs in flower development have been demonstrated in numerous dicots, little is known about the function of these meristem identity genes in the more distantly related flowering plants, the monocots. We used reverse genetics to investigate the role of two duplicate FLORICAULA/LEAFY homologs in maize (Zea mays L. ssp. mays) - a monocot species with dramatically different flower and inflorescence morphology from that of dicot species. Transposon insertions into the maize genes, zfl1 and zfl2, led to a disruption of floral organ identity and patterning, as well as to defects in inflorescence architecture and in the vegetative to reproductive phase transition. Our results demonstrate that these genes share conserved roles with their dicot counterparts in flower and inflorescence patterning. The phenotype of zfl1; zfl2 double mutants suggests that these maize FLORICAULA/LEAFY homologs act as upstream regulators of the ABC floral organ identity genes, and this along with previously published work, indicates that the transcriptional network regulating flower development is at least partially conserved between monocots and dicots. Our data also suggest that the zfl genes may play a novel role in controlling quantitative aspects of inflorescence phyllotaxy in maize, consistent with their candidacy for quantitative trait loci that control differences in inflorescence structure between maize and its progenitor, teosinte.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据