4.5 Article

Survival and hospitalization in heart failure patients with or without diabetes treated with β-blockers

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 192-202

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1054/jcaf.2003.31

关键词

mortality; outcome research; diabetes mellitus; beta-blockers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Physicians are still concerned about prescribing beta-blockers in diabetic patients with heart failure. Methods: In the outcome research study (the Beta-Blockers in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure: Guided Use in Clinical Practice [BRING-UP] study), the responsible clinicians could decide whether to start beta-blocker treatment and which agent to use. A total of 3091 patients were enrolled by 202 cardiologic centers: 25% of the recruited patients were already on beta-blockers, 28% started treatment at the enrollment visit, and 47% were not started on beta-blockers. Results: The 1-year mortality, hospitalization rate, and the combined end point of mortality or hospitalization were higher in diabetic patients (15.8% versus 10.9%; relative risk [RR] = 1.44; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.16-1.78, P = .001) (31.0% versus 24.0%; RR = 1.28; 95% CI 1.11-1.49; P = .0009) (40.5% versus 30.1%; RR = 1.35; 95% CI 1.19-1.51; P = .0001). The event-free analysis of the 4 groups (diabetic patients not treated with beta-blockers, diabetic patients treated with beta-blockers, nondiabetic patients not treated with beta-blockers, nondiabetic patients treated with beta-blockers) showed that patients treated with beta-blockers had a higher event-free probability than patients not treated with beta-blockers regardless the presence of diabetes (P < .0001). Conclusions: On the basis of post hoc analysis, diabetic patients with chronic heart failure benefit from beta-blockers even if at a lower degree. Thus, there are no justifications to avoid beta-blockers in heart failure patients in the presence of diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据