4.7 Article

Separation and toxicity of enantiomers of organophosphorus insecticide leptophos

期刊

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
卷 55, 期 2, 页码 236-242

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0147-6513(02)00066-0

关键词

HPLC; enantioseparation; leptophos; Whelk-01 column

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enantionters of leptophos were separated by high-performance liquid chromatography with a Whelk-O1 column using 3% dichloromethane in n-hexane as mobile phase. Toxicity tests of leptophos enantiomers and racemate were performed with daphnia. Enzyme inhibition of leptohpos was carried out by using butyryl cholinesterase from horse serum and acetylcholinesterase from housefly heads. From the inhibition test of butyrylcholinesterase, the half-inhibitory concentrations, IC50, of (+)-leptophos, (-)leptophos, and (+/-)-leptophos were 0.241, 1.17, and 1.05 g mL(-1), respectively. No significant difference in IC50 in (-)-leptophos and (+/-)-leptophos was found. However, the IC50 Of (+)-leptophos was significantly different from those of the others. In the inhibition test of acetylcholinesterase, the IC50 values of (+)-leptophos, (-)-leptophos, and (+/-)-leptophos were 14.01, 24.32, and 13.22 g mL(-1), respectively. There was no significant difference in IC50 in (+)-leptophos and (+/-)-leptophos, although the IC50 Of (-)-leptophos was significantly different from those of the others. From these results, leptophos-both enantiomers and racemate-seems to have higher neurotoxicity for mammals than for the target insects. In the toxicity test of daphnia, the half-lethal concentrations, LC50, of (+)-leptophos, (-)-leptophos, and (+/-)-leptophos were 0.0387, 0.802, and 0.0409 g L-1, respectively. There is no significant difference in LC50 in (+)-leptophos and (+/-)-leptophos. The LC50 of (-)-leptophos is significantly higher than those of the others. From these results, (-)-leptophos has lower toxicity to daphnia. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据