4.7 Article

Optimising conditions for radiolabelling of DOTA-peptides with 90Y, 111In and 177Lu at high specific activities

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1142-0

关键词

DOTA; radiolabelling; specific activity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DOTA-conjugated peptides, such as [DOTA(0), Tyr(3)]octreotide (DOTATOC) and [DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreolate (DOTA-tate), can be labelled with radionuclides such as Y-90, In-111 and Lu-177. These radiolabelled somatostatin analogues are used for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Radioligands for PRRT require high specific activities. However, although these radionuclides are produced without addition of carrier, contaminants are introduced during production and as decay products. In this study, parameters influencing the kinetics of labelling of DOTA-peptides were investigated and conditions were optimised to obtain the highest achievable specific activity. The effects of contaminants were systematically investigated, concentration dependently, in a test model mimicking conditions for labelling with minimal molar excess of DOTA-peptides over radionuclide. Kinetics of labelling of DOTA-peptides were optimal at pH 4-4.5; pH <4 strongly slowed down the kinetics. Above pH 5, reaction kinetics varied owing to the formation of radionuclide hydroxides. Labelling with Y-90 and Lu-177 was completed after 20 min at 80degreesC, while labelling with In-111 was completed after 30 min at 100degreesC. The effects of contaminants were systematically categorised, e.g. Cd2+ is the target and decay product of In-111, and it was found to be a strong competitor with In-111 for incorporation in DOTA. In contrast, Zr4+ and Hf4+, decay products of Y-90 and Lu-177, respectively, did not interfere with the incorporation of these radionuclides. The following conclusions are drawn: (a) DOTA-peptides can be radiolabelled at high specific activity; (b) reaction kinetics differ for each radionuclide; and (c) reactions can be hampered by contaminants, such as target material and decay products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据