4.4 Article

Characterization of two independent amino acid substitutions that disrupt the DNA repair functions of the yeast Apn1

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 42, 期 21, 页码 6436-6445

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi034163m

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The members of the Endo IV family of DNA repair enzymes, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae April and Escherichia coli endonuclease IV, possess the capacity to cleave abasic sites and to remove 3'-blocking groups at single-strand breaks via apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease and 3'-diesterase activities, respectively. In addition, Endo IV family members are able to recognize and incise oxidative base damages on the 5'-side of such lesions. We previously identified eight amino acid substitutions that prevent E. coli endonuclease IV from repairing damaged DNA in vivo. Two of these substitutions were glycine replacements of Glu145 and Asp179. Both Glu145 and Asp179 are among nine amino acid residues within the active site pocket of endonuclease IV that coordinate the position of a trinuclear Zn cluster required for efficient phosphodiester bond cleavage. We now report the first structure-function analysis of the eukaryotic counterpart of endonuclease IV, yeast April. We show that glycine substitutions at the corresponding conserved amino acid residues of yeast April, i.e., Glu158 and Asp 192, abolish the biological function of this enzyme. However, these Apn1 variants do not exhibit the same characteristics as the corresponding E. coli mutants. Indeed, the Apn1 Glu158Gly mutant, but not the E. coli endonuclease IV Glu145Gly mutant, is able to bind DNA. Moreover, April Asp192Gly completely lacks enzymatic activity, while the activity of the E. coli counterpart Asp179Gly is reduced by similar to40-fold. The data suggest that although yeast April and E. coli endonuclease IV exhibit a high degree of structural and functional similarity, differences exist within the active site pockets of these two enzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据