4.8 Article

Interferon-β treatment eliminates cardiotropic viruses and improves left ventricular function in patients with myocardial persistence of viral genomes and left ventricular dysfunction

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 107, 期 22, 页码 2793-2798

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000072766.67150.51

关键词

cardiomyopathy; viruses; biopsy; heart failure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Viral infections are important causes of myocarditis and may induce cardiac dysfunction and finally lead to dilated cardiomyopathy. We investigated whether interferon (IFN)-beta therapy is safe and may achieve virus clearance and prevent deterioration of left ventricular (LV) function in patients with myocardial virus persistence. Methods and Results-In this phase II study, 22 consecutive patients with persistence of LV dysfunction (history of symptoms, 44 +/- 27 months) and polymerase chain reaction-proven enteroviral or adenoviral genomes were treated with 18 x 10(6) IU/week IFN-beta (Beneferon) subcutaneously for 24 weeks. Histological and immunohistological analysis of endomyocardial biopsies was used to characterize myocardial inflammation. LV diameters and ejection fraction were assessed by echocardiography and angiography, respectively. During the treatment period, IFN-beta was well tolerated by all patients. No patient deteriorated. Clearance of viral genomes was observed in 22 of 22 of patients after antiviral therapy. Virus clearance was paralleled by a significant decrease of LV end diastolic and end systolic diameters, decreasing from 59.7 +/- 11.1 to 56.5 +/- 10.0 mm (P < 0.001) and 43.2 +/- 13.6 to 39.4 +/- 12.1 mm (P < 0.001), respectively. LV ejection fraction increased from 44.6 +/- 15.5% to 53.1 +/- 16.8% (P < 0.001). Conclusions-A 6 months, IFN-beta treatment was safe in patients with myocardial enteroviral or adenoviral persistence and LV dysfunction and resulted in elimination of viral genomes (22 of 22 patients) and improved LV function (15 of 22 patients).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据