4.6 Article

Anisotropic superparamagnetism of monodispersive cobalt-platinum nanocrystals -: art. no. 224416

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 67, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.224416

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on the high-temperature organometallic route [Sun Science 287, 1989 (2000)], we have synthesized powders containing CoPt3 single crystals with mean diameters of 3.3(2) and 6.0(2) nm and small log-normal widths sigma=0.15(1). In the entire temperature range from 5 to 400 K, the zero-field-cooled susceptibility chi(T) displays significant deviations from ideal superparamagnetism. Approaching the Curie temperature of 450(10) K, the deviations arise from the mean-field-type reduction of the ferromagnetic moments, while below the blocking temperature T-b, chi(T) is suppressed by the presence of energy barriers, the distributions of which scale with the particle volumes obtained from transmission electron microscopy. This indication for volume anisotropy is supported by scaling analyses of the shape of the magnetic absorption chi(')(T,omega) which reveal distribution functions for the barriers also being consistent with the volume distributions observed by TEM. Above 200 K, the magnetization isotherms M(H,T) display Langevin behavior providing 2.5(1)mu(B) per CoPt3, in agreement with reports on bulk and thin-film CoPt3. The non-Langevin shape of the magnetization curves at lower temperatures is interpreted as anisotropic superparamagnetism by taking into account an anisotropy energy of the nanoparticles E-A(T). Using the magnitude and temperature variation of E-A(T), the mean energy barriers and 'unphysical' small switching times of the particles obtained from the analyses of chi(')(T,omega) are explained. Below T-b hysteresis loops appear and are quantitatively described by a blocking model, which also ignores particle interactions, but takes the size distributions from TEM and the conventional field dependence of E-A into account.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据