4.2 Article

Effect of refeeding on IGFI, IGFII, IGF receptors, FGF2, FGF6, and myostatin mRNA expression in rainbow trout myotomal muscle

期刊

GENERAL AND COMPARATIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 132, 期 2, 页码 209-215

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-6480(03)00081-9

关键词

muscle growth; gene expression; real-time quantitative RT-PCR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fish endure long periods of fasting and demonstrate an extensive capacity for rapid and complete recovery after refeeding. The underlying mechanisms through which nutrient intake activates an increase in somatic growth and especially in muscle growth is poorly understood. In this study we examined the expression profile of major muscle growth regulators in trout white muscle 4, 12, and 34 days after refeeding, using real-time quantitative RT-PCR. Mean insulin-like growth factor I (IGFI) mRNA level in muscle increased dramatically 8- and 15-fold, 4 and 12 days, respectively, after refeeding compared to fasted trout. This declined thereafter. Conversely, only a weak but gradual increase in mean insulin-like growth factor II (IGFII) mRNA level was observed during refeeding. Inversely to IGFI. mean IGF receptor Ia (IGFRIa) mRNA level declined after ingestion of food. In contrast, IGF receptor Ib (IGFRIb) mRNA level was not affected by refeeding. Mean fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) mRNA level increased by 2.5-fold both 4 and 12 days after refeeding, whereas fibroblast growth factor 6 (FGF6) and myostatin mRNA levels were unchanged. Subsequent to IGFI and FGF2 gene activation, an increase in myogenin mRNA accumulation was observed at 12 days post-refeeding suggesting that an active differentiation of myogenic cells succeeds their proliferation. In conclusion, among the potential growth factors we examined in this study, IGFI and FGF2 were identified as candidate genes whose expression may contribute to muscle compensatory growth induced by refeeding. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据