4.7 Article

Mechanisms and implications of platelet discoid shape

期刊

BLOOD
卷 101, 期 12, 页码 4789-4796

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-11-3491

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The platelet marginal band consists of a single peripheral microtubule (MT) that is wound in 8 to 12 coils and maintains discoid cell shape. About 90% of beta-tubulin in the marginal band is of the divergent, megakaryocyte (MK)/platelet-restricted beta1 isoform. beta1-tubulin-null mice show reduced proplatelet formation, thrombocytopenia, and platelet spherocytosis. Here, we show that structural abnormalities in resting beta1-tubulin(-/-) platelets include frequent kinks and breaks in the marginal band. Platelets derived from mice lacking the transcription factor GATA1 show similar defects, probably as a direct consequence of ab-sent beta1-tubulin. beta1-tubulin(+/-) platelets have normal ratios of beta-tubulin isotypes but the marginal band is half the normal thickness, which is sufficient to maintain elliptical cell shape. Thus, a threshold 50% or less of the normal amount of beta1-tubulin is required to preserve marginal band integrity and cell shape. beta1-tubulin(-/-) platelets have normal size and contents and show no defects in serotonin release or aggregation. Accordingly, the apparently isolated spherocytosis allows investigation of the role of discoid platelet shape in hemostasis. On agonist stimulation, the disorganized MTs in beta1-tubulin(-/-) platelets fail to condense into central rings and instead are dispersed in short bundles and linear arrays. Nevertheless, intravital microscopy and flow chamber studies demonstrate full functionality of these spherocytic platelets under physiologic shear conditions. Together, these findings highlight the essential requirements of the MK/platelet-restricted beta1-tubulin isoform in platelet structure and suggest that spherocytosis does not impair many aspects of platelet function. (C) 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据