4.7 Article

Erythropoiesis from acetyl LDL incorporating endothelial cells at the preliver stage

期刊

BLOOD
卷 101, 期 12, 页码 4733-4738

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-09-2799

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Erythropoiesis is characterized by 2 waves of production during mouse embryogenesis: a primitive one originating from the yolk sac (YS) and a definitive one produced from both the YS and the embryo proper. How the latter wave is generated remains unclear. To investigate our hypothesis that endothelial cells (ECs) could generate erythroid cells, we designed a method to label ECs at 10 days after coitus. This labeling method associates 2 techniques: an intracardiac inoculation that allows molecules to be delivered into the bloodstream followed by a whole-embryo culture period. DII-conjugated acetylated low-density lipoproteins (Ac-LDL-Dil) were used to specifically tag ECs from the inside. One hour after inoculation, Dil staining was found along the entire endothelial tree. Fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis revealed that Dil(+) cells were CD31(+), CD34(+), and CD45(-), an antigen makeup characteristic of the endothelial lineage. Twelve hours after inoculation, 43% of Dil(+) circulating cells belonged to the erythroid lineage. These cells expressed Ter119 and displayed an adult globin chain arrangement; thus they belonged to the definitive lineage as confirmed in erythroid colony formation. The remaining cells likely represent committed white blood cells or multipotent progenitors, as revealed by a mixed-colony formation. Beyond the 29-somite stage, the proportion of Dil+ erythroid cells gradually decreased. These results demonstrate the generation of hematopoietic cells from an endothelial intermediate, using in vivo tracing. We provide evidence for a release of these cells into the circulation and hypothesize that these cells are able to colonize the fetal liver and generate definitive erythrocytes in vivo. (C) 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据