4.7 Article

Effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist on electrical and structural remodeling in atrial fibrillation

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 41, 期 12, 页码 2197-2204

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00464-9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) antagonist on chronic structural remodeling in atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND We previously reported that an AT1R antagonist, candesartan, prevents acute electrical remodeling in a rapid pacing model. However, the effect of candesartan on chronic structural remodeling in AF is unclear. METHODS Sustained AF was induced in 20 dogs (10 in a control group and 10 in a candesartan group) by rapid pacing of the right atrium (RA) at 400 beats/min for five weeks. Candesartan was administered orally (10 mg/kg/day) for one week before rapid pacing and was continued for five weeks. The AF duration, atrial effective refractory period (AERP) at four sites in the RA, and intra-atrial conduction time (CT) from the RA appendage to the other three sites were measured every week. RESULTS The mean AF duration in the control group after five weeks was significantly longer than that with candesartan (1,333 +/- 725 vs. 411 +/- 301 s, p < 0.01). The degree of AERP shortening after five weeks was not significantly different between the two groups. The CT from the RA appendage to the low RA after five weeks with candesartan was significantly shorter than that in the control (43 +/- 14 vs. 68 +/- 10 ms, p < 0.05). The candesartan group had a significantly lower percentage of interstitial fibrosis than the control group (7 +/- 2% vs. 16 +/- 1% at the RA appendage, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Candesartan can prevent the promotion of AF by suppressing the development of structural remodeling. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:2197-204) (C) 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据