4.4 Article

Weak yet distinct mutagenicity of acrylamide in mammalian cells

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/95.12.889

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA84469] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Despite concern raised with the announcement that common heating processes such as frying introduce acrylamide, a known rodent carcinogen, into food, the mutagenicity of acrylamide in mammalian DNA is controversial. Methods: Big Blue mouse embryonic fibroblasts, which carry a lambda phage cII transgene, were treated with acrylamide. Formation of DNA adducts was determined by terminal transferase-dependent polymerase chain reaction. Mutational events were detected with a X phage-based mutagenesis assay and expressed as the frequency of the number of mutant cII plaques per total number of plaques screened. Mutations were confirmed by DNA sequence analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: In vitro treatment of the cells with acrylamide at millimolar concentrations induced DNA adducts along the cII gene. Treatment with acrylamide at micromolar concentrations increased the frequency of mutations in the cII gene up to twofold relative to control treatment (13.8 x 10(-5), 95% confidence interval [CI] = 12.3 to 15.3 x 10(-5) versus 6.9 x 10(-5), 95% CI = 6.5 to 7.3 x 10(-5), df = 2, 21; P <.001; ANOVA). The specificity of acrylamide in inducing cII gene mutations was shown by a statistically significantly different mutational spectrum from that in control-treated cells, with an excess of G --> C transversions and A --> G transitions (P = .024; Adams and Skopek test). Although some of the frequently mutated sites in the cII gene co-localized with sites of preferential DNA adduct formation, there was no direct relationship. Conclusion: Acrylamide had distinct mutagenicity in transgenic mouse embryonic fibroblast cells, which might potentially be ascribed to its DNA adduct-inducing property. Whether acrylamide has the same effects on human cells is yet to be determined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据