4.6 Article

Increased constitutive c-Jun N-terminal kinase signaling in mice lacking glutathione S-transferase Pi

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 278, 期 25, 页码 22243-22249

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M301211200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glutathione S-transferase Pi (GSTP) detoxifies electrophiles by catalyzing their conjugation with reduced glutathione. A second function of this protein in cell defense has recently been proposed that is related to its ability to interact with c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK). The present study aimed to determine whether this interaction results in increased constitutive JNK activity in the absence of GSTP in GstP1/P2((-/-)) mice and whether such a phenomenon leads to the up-regulation of genes that are relevant to cell defense. We found a significant increase in constitutive JNK activity in the liver and lung of GstP1/P2(-/-) compared with GstP1/ P2((+/+)) mice. The greatest increase in constitutive JNK activity was observed in null liver and was accompanied by a significant increase in activator protein-1 DNA binding activity (8-fold) and in the mRNA levels for the antioxidant protein heme oxygenase-1 compared with wild type. Furthermore UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A6 mRNA levels were significantly higher in the livers of GstP1/P2((-/-)) compared with GstP1/ P2((+/+)) mice, which correlated to a 2- fold increase in constitutive activity both in vitro and in vivo. There was no difference in the gene expression of other UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms, manganese superoxide dismutase, microsomal epoxide hydrolase, or GSTA1 between GstP1/ P2((-/-)) and GstP1/ P2((+/+)) mice. Additionally there was no phenotypic difference in the induction of heme oxygenase-1 mRNA after acetaminophen administration. This study not only demonstrates the role of GSTP as a direct inhibitor of JNK in vivo but also its role in regulating the constitutive expression of specific downstream molecular targets of the JNK signaling pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据