4.0 Article

Soil Moisture and Soil Nutrient Content in Walnut-Crop Intercropping Systems in the Loess Plateau of China

期刊

ARID LAND RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 285-296

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15324982.2012.694394

关键词

agroforestry; intercropping; interspecies competition; Loess Plateau; soil moisture; soil nutrients

资金

  1. Central Universities Fund for Scientific Research and Action [HJ2010-24]
  2. National Scientific and Technology Program of China [2011BAD38B02]
  3. Beijing Municipal Education Commission's Project for the establishment of key disciplines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Agroforestry has been widely applied in the Loess Plateau of China as a means of reducing soil and water losses, restoring ecological balance, and improving both land-use efficiency and economic returns. However, agroforestry also introduces a degree of competition for soil moisture and nutrients. Walnut (Juglans regia L.)-peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and walnut-soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) intercropping systems that have been used throughout the Loess Plateau were selected as the basis for a study of agroforestry system-its advantages and its disadvantages with respect to soil moisture, soil nutrients, root distributions, yields, and economic returns. The results showed that soil moisture and nutrient levels were affected by intercropping with walnut trees, and that the degree to which they were affected decreased as distance from the trees increased. On the other hand, intercropping with walnut trees can increase land-use efficiency by 75% and economic returns by 17%. On the basis of the study findings, we conclude that walnut-peanut and walnut-soybean intercropping can be practical and beneficial in the study region, but irrigation and fertilization methods need to be further studied and improved, root barriers should be installed at the tree-crop interface, and the distance between crops and tree rows should be adjusted to minimize competition for soil moisture and nutrients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据