4.5 Article

Periaqueductal gray-evoked dorsal root reflex is frequency dependent

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 976, 期 2, 页码 217-226

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(03)02718-5

关键词

dorsal root ganglion; spinal cord; primary afferent; synapse

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dorsal root reflex (DRR) is an antidromic action potential originating in the spinal cord that propagates toward the periphery. Given that both GABA A and 5-HT3 receptors are involved in the generation of DRRs and stimulation of the periaqueductal gray (PAG) can induce the release of GABA and serotonin within the spinal cord, we investigated the modulation of DRRs by the PAG descending system. The central end of the cut left L5 dorsal root in adult Sprague-Dawley rats was tested with single fiber recording. Stimulating electrodes were placed in the PAG. sciatic nerve, or transcutaneously across hindpaws. Fifty-seven DRRs were recorded for the effect of PAG stimulation in 19 rats. and 51 DRRs from 26 rats and nine DRRs from seven rats were recorded for an effect of ipsilateral and contralateral peripheral stimulation, respectively. The results were expressed as a percentage of the number of DRRs over the number of stimuli. PAG stimulation at 0.2. 0.5, 5, 20, and 50 Hz produced ratio's of 113.16 +/- 9.84, 114.54 +/- 12.22, 24.6 +/- 3.23, 17.77 +/- 4.76, and 12.62 +/- 3.44 (%). respectively. Stimulation at ipsilateral peripheral nerve evoked DRRs of 103.26 +/- 8.93, 95.27 +/- 10.57, 37.66 +/- 7.55, 11.32 +/- 4.96, and 5.32 +/- 3.82 (%), respectively. Stimulation of the contralateral peripheral nerve evoked DRRs of 90.88 +/- 15.59, 44.30 +/- 10.77, 6.29 +/- 1.63. 0.45 +/- 0.19, and 0.29 +/- 0.15 (%), respectively. Transection at the thoracic spinal level completely eliminated PAG-incluced DRRs. In conclusion, both PAG and peripheral stimulation produced DRRs in a frequency dependent manner. Stimulus intensity has no significant effect on DRRs. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据