4.7 Article

Association of transforming growth factor-β1 gene polymorphisms with a hepatocellular carcinoma risk in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 196-202

出版社

KOREAN SOC MED BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1038/emm.2003.27

关键词

chronic hepatitis; HBV; genetic susceptibility; hepatocellular carcinoma; single nucleotide polymorphism; transforming growth factor-beta 1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) can act as both a tumor suppressor and a stimulator of tumor progression. We have examined the relationship between polymorphisms of the TGF-beta1 gene and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. A total of 1,237 Korean subjects were prospectively enrolled; 1,046 patients with chronic HBV infection and 191 healthy controls with no evidence of recent or remote HBV infection. The patients were divided into two groups: those without (n = 809) and those with HCC (n = 237). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of TGF-beta1 were searched for and genotyped using the single base extension method. In Korean subjects, only two SNPs were found among the seven known polymorphisms of TGF-beta1, at position -509 and in codon 10. The risk of HCC was significantly lower in patients with the T/T or CIT genotypes than in those with the C/C genotypes at position -509 (P < 0.02), and also lower among those with the Pro/Pro or Leu/Pro genotypes than in those with the Leu/Leu genotypes in codon 10 (P < 0.007). Haplotype analysis revealed that the possession of [-509C > T; L10P] conferred a decreased likelihood of HCC (OR = 0.74; 95% Cl, 0.59-0.93; P = 0.008). In conclusion, the presence of the TGF-beta1 -509C > T promoter or of the L10P polymorphism, and the combination of both [-509C > T; L10P] as a haplotype were strongly associated with a reduced risk of HCC in patients with chronic HBV infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据