4.6 Article

Lysophosphatidic acid prevents renal ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibition of apoptosis and complement activation

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 163, 期 1, 页码 47-56

出版社

AMER SOC INVESTIGATIVE PATHOLOGY, INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63629-2

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Renal ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury is an important cause of acute renal failure as observed after renal transplantation, major surgery, trauma, and septic as well as hemorrhagic shock. We previously showed that the inhibition of apoptosis is protective against renal I/R injury, indicating that apoptotic cell-death is an important feature of I/R injury. Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is an endogenous phospholipid growth factor with anti-apoptotic properties. This tempted us to investigate the effects of exogenous LPA in a murine model of renal I/R injury. LPA administered at the time of reperfusion dose dependently inhibited renal apoptosis as evaluated by the presence of internucleosomal DNA cleavage. I/R-induced renal apoptosis was only present in tubular epithelial cells with evident disruption of brush border as assessed by immunohistochemistry for active caspase-7 and filamentous actin, respectively. LPA treatment specifically prevented tubular epithelial cell apoptosis but also reduced the I/R-induced loss of brush-border integrity. Besides, LPA showed strong anti-inflammatory effects, inhibiting the renal expression of tumor necrosis factor-a and abrogating the influx of neutrophils. Next, LPA dose dependently inhibited activation of the complement system. Moreover, treatment with LPA abrogated the loss of renal function in the course of renal I/R. This study is the first to show that administration of the phospholipid LPA prevents I/R injury, abrogating apoptosis and inflammation. Moreover, exogenous LPA is capable of preventing organ failure because of an ischemic insult and thus may provide new means to treat clinical conditions associated with I/R injury in the kidney and potentially also in other organs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据